Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Ethnohistory 2007 54(3):373-406; DOI:10.1215/00141801-2007-001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Gorman, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Duke University Press

Articles

The Myth of Moccasin Bluff: Rethinking the Potawatomi Pattern

Jodie A. O'Gorman

Michigan State University

In a 1969 Ethnohistory article James Fitting and Charles Cleland developed an ethnographic model derived from the Potawatomi Pattern of large, semipermanent villages with an emphasis on corn agriculture to interpret earlier cultural adaptations within the Carolinian biotic province. This and other works created and perpetuated the Myth of Moccasin Bluff, which identifies the Moccasin Bluff site in southwestern Michigan as an example of an agricultural village of the Potawatomi Pattern. In this essay the fit between the archaeological record and the Potawatomi Pattern analogue is reexamined, and the validity of transposing the historically observed focus on agriculture into more ancient history is critiqued. An alternative research framework for modeling ancient Potawatomi history is outlined.







  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2007 by American Society for Ethnohistory