Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Ethnohistory 2002 49(4):769-788; DOI:10.1215/00141801-49-4-769
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carson, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Duke University Press

Articles

Ethnogeography and the Native American Past

James Taylor Carson

Queen's University, Ontario

Abstract.

For the most part, scholars have failed to incorporate geography into the interdisciplinary canon of ethnohistory. At the same time, geographers writing on native history have not integrated fully the ethnohistorical method into their own work. The essay explains to ethnohistorians and geographers alike what the other has been up to and why it is vital that each group begin to consider ethnogeography as an important category of analysis. A few suggestions are made as to how ethnogeography can illuminate different native societies' understanding of land and their relationship to it and to also help explain the actions they took to defend it from the encroachments of European settlers and colonial expansion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EthnohistoryHome page
J. A. O'Gorman
The Myth of Moccasin Bluff: Rethinking the Potawatomi Pattern
Ethnohistory, July 1, 2007; 54(3): 373 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2002 by American Society for Ethnohistory